Writes correct code
Technically sound, but struggles with architectural reasoning.
Move beyond resumes, aptitude tests, uni-dimensional coding tests, AI-generated portfolios and AI-bot evaluations. SCAV™ identifies developers who can code, solve problems, work effectively with AI, and adapt to what's next.
Can someone produce code?
Can someone build reliable systems, solve unfamiliar problems, evaluate trade-offs, collaborate with AI and keep adapting?
Technically sound, but struggles with architectural reasoning.
Demonstrates exceptional engineering judgement by leveraging AI intelligently.
Outperforms peers within months of joining because of extraordinary velocity.
Traditional assessments rarely distinguish between these profiles.
A multidimensional approach to measuring developer intelligence — combining technical execution, engineering reasoning, AI-augmented development and learning adaptability into a unified framework for evaluating engineering readiness.
SCAV™ does not replace existing assessment approaches. It extends them — recognising that engineering excellence emerges from the interaction of multiple capabilities, not from coding performance alone.
Modern engineering requires more — a set of new hard skills.
Measures coding proficiency, code quality, problem-solving accuracy, and the ability to deliver reliable software solutions.
Evaluates analytical thinking, engineering reasoning, code thinking and the ability to navigate coding challenges.
Assesses how developers leverage AI tools to accelerate development, improve outcomes, and enhance engineering productivity.
Measures learning agility, adaptability, and the ability to acquire new skills and perform in rapidly changing environments.
Whether you assess your own applicants or shortlist from our benchmarked pool, SCAV™ compresses the journey from requisition to offer.
Bring your own applicant funnel. Assess every candidate across the four SCAV™ dimensions and shortlist with confidence.
Define the role profile and pick the SCAV™ dimensions that matter most.
Send a single assessment link — proctored, fair and role-calibrated.
SCAV™ scores, L1–L5 proficiency and structured interview guides per candidate.
Focus panels on high-signal candidates with clear hiring recommendations.
Skip sourcing. Access 40,000+ pre-assessed developers from the LNBE national benchmark and shortlist in minutes.
Tell us the stack, level and SCAV™ profile you need.
Slice by SCAV™ score, L1–L5 level, campus, region and dimension.
Every profile ships with a full SCAV™ Hiring Intelligence report.
Interview shortlisted candidates and close hires in days, not weeks.



Rohan combines efficient coding discipline and system-level thinking with strong AI-augmented workflows — a high potential to contribute effectively from day one.
Engineering Strength (Skills + Capability) × Future Potential (AI-Augmented Dev + Velocity)
The Litcoder National Benchmark Evaluation (LNBE) and integrated National Talent Intelligence Championship — one nationally benchmarked early-stage developer hiring pool.

SCAV™ reports give you deep, benchmarked insights to identify, compare and hire
engineering talent with confidence.

| ☐ | Candidate | SCAV™ | Percentile | Skills | Capability | AI | Agility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ☑ | Akash Sharma | 78 | Top 15% | L5 | L4 | L5 | L4 |
| ☑ | Priya Reddy | 76 | Top 18% | L4 | L5 | L4 | L5 |
| ☑ | Meera Nair | 69 | Top 25% | L2 | L3 | L4 | L3 |
| ☑ | Aditya Kulkarni | 68 | Top 25% | L3 | L3 | L4 | L3 |
| ☑ | Vikram Singh | 65 | Top 30% | L3 | L2 | L3 | L4 |
SCAV™ supports human judgement. It does not replace it.
Enterprise-grade data governance and access controls.
AI signals contribute to insight, never the sole decision basis.
National benchmarks support workforce planning, anonymized and aggregated.